WALEED TARIQNEC4 vs FIDIC 2017 · Module 1: Two contracts, one scheme
Start

NEC4 vs FIDIC 2017 · Module 1 of 10

Two contracts, one scheme

Aldermere Water lets one flood relief scheme twice, once under the and once under the . Meet the people who run each version, then learn what makes a notice count.

20 stepsAbout 20 minutes

Independent course material. It is not published or endorsed by NEC or FIDIC. Clause references are to the NEC4 ECC (June 2017 with amendments January 2023) and the FIDIC Red Book 2017 as first published. Short quotes from NEC4 (© NEC 2017) and the FIDIC Red Book (© FIDIC 2017) are used for review and comment. Read the full clauses in your own copy of the contract.

Exhibit 1The cast at Aldermere

One team, two sets of titles

At AldermereECCRed Book
Aldermere WaterClientEmployer
Dana WhitfieldProject ManagerEngineer
Tom BarrowSupervisorEngineer’s Representative
Merrow Vale CivilsContractorContractor
Owen HaleNot in this versionContractor’s Representative
Disputes, with one member
The same team runs both versions. The Red Book adds one role, the Contractor’s Representative.

Source: ECC 11.2(13), 24.1, W1.2. FIDIC 3.1, 3.3, 4.3, 21.1.

Key terms

Eight terms to know before you compare the two contracts

Terms in this module

Tap a term with a dotted underline anywhere in the lesson to see its meaning.

Red Book

The FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction, Second Edition 2017, for works the Employer designs. FIDIC reissued it with amendments in 2022.

Employer

The party that orders and pays for the works under the Red Book. It matches the ECC Client, and NEC3 contracts also used the word.

FIDIC 1.1.31

Engineer

The person the Employer appoints to run the Red Book contract. The Engineer acts for the Employer, but must be neutral when agreeing or determining under Sub-⁠Clause 3.7.

FIDIC 1.1.35

Engineer’s Representative

A person the Engineer may appoint, based on Site, with the authority the Engineer delegates by Notice. The nearest ECC role is the Supervisor.

FIDIC 3.3

Contractor’s Representative

The person who acts for the Contractor under the Red Book and alone gives and receives its Notices. The ECC has no equivalent role.

FIDIC 4.3

Notice

A formal written message labelled as a Notice and sent under Sub-⁠Clause 1.3. An electronic Notice is deemed received the day after it is sent.

FIDIC 1.1.56

Claim

One Party’s request to the other for something it says the contract entitles it to, such as more time or money. Either Party can claim.

FIDIC 1.1.6

compensation event

An event the contract lists that can give the Contractor more money or time, such as a Scope change or unexpected ground conditions. Some can reduce the Prices.

ECC 60.1

Source: FIDIC 1.1.6, 1.1.31, 1.1.35, 1.1.43, 1.1.56, 3.3, 4.3. ECC 60.1.

One scheme, let twice

Most ECC terms have a Red Book partner, but few pairs match exactly

Exhibit 2The same idea in each contract
ECCRed Book
or an assistant
Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board
No set representativeThe names  (24.1)Gives and receives every Notice (4.3)
ECCRed Book
and
Site data the Employer makes available (2.5)
A lump sum for each activityRates for measured work, in the
the
plus , or rates
ECCRed Book
The day the contract was made: 5 January 202628 days before tenders were due: 13 October 2025
A number of days from the Commencement Date
Taking over, and the

The Contract Date and the Base Date are each the date for judging what an experienced contractor could have foreseen (Module 4).

ECCRed Book
, or a
End of the (DNP)

Module 4 compares the two routes to more time and money.

Source: ECC 11.2(4), 11.2(16), 11.2(18), 11.2(21), 11.2(32), 60.1(12). FIDIC 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 1.1.85, 2.5.

How each contract is built

The ECC assembles Options, while the Red Book amends one printed text

Exhibit 3Aldermere’s contracts

ECCJune 2017, amended 2023

Part oneClientPart twoContractor

Names

  1. Core clausesalways included
  2. main Option, one of A to F
  3. dispute Option, one of W1 to W3
  4. and secondary
  5. No no extra conditions

Italics mark Contract Data terms, capitals defined terms (11.1).

Red Book2017, first published

Part APart BSpecial Provisions

Other documents

DrawingsSchedules

Reissued in 2022: check your printing.

Source: ECC 11.1, Z1.1. Contract Data part one. FIDIC 1.1.9, 1.1.10, 1.1.12, 1.1.59, 1.1.75.

Who does what

Under the Red Book, Tom’s powers are delegated, and only Owen sends Merrow Vale’s Notices

Exhibit 4The people
ECC
Client · PartyAldermere Water
Contractor · PartyMerrow Vale Civils
  • Project ManagerDana WhitfieldAlone changes the Scope (14.3)
  • SupervisorTom BarrowOwn quality powers
  • includeLeila Moss, Raj Patel

The names Dana, Tom, Leila and Raj, but none is a .

Red Book
Employer · PartyAldermere Water
Contractor · PartyMerrow Vale Civils
  • EngineerDana WhitfieldNeutral under 3.7
    • Engineer’s RepresentativeTom BarrowBased on Site. Inspection and testing, delegated by Notice
  • Contractor’s RepresentativeOwen HaleFull time on Site. Gives every Notice

Tom’s powers start once both Parties receive Dana’s Notice.

Source: ECC 11.2(13), 14.3, 24.1, 41.5, 43.1, 43.2. FIDIC 3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 3.7, 4.3.

Who does what

The Engineer turns neutral only when agreeing or determining under Sub-⁠Clause 3.7

Exhibit 5Neutral, for the Employer, or as the ECC states?

“the Engineer shall act neutrally between the Parties” (FIDIC 3.7)

Action 1 of 6

…

Source: ECC 10.1, 14.1, W1.2(2). FIDIC 3.2, 3.7, 3.7.2.

Who does what

The Red Book bars delegating some powers, while the ECC bars none

Exhibit 6Who can act for Dana and for Owen?

Can Dana hand Tom her 3.7 work or a ?

No. They are the two powers an Engineer can never delegate.

FIDIC 3.4

Can Dana let a colleague reply to Leila’s notification?

Yes, once she has notified Merrow Vale of the and the actions. Any Project Manager action can be delegated.

ECC 14.2

Can Owen let Leila give Merrow Vale’s Notices?

No. Owen may delegate other powers, but never giving or receiving Notices and other communications, or receiving instructions.

FIDIC 4.3

Owen doubts an instruction from Tom. What can he do?

Refer it to Dana by a Notice. It stands unless she reverses or varies it within 7 days after she receives the Notice.

FIDIC 3.4

Dana can cancel a delegation later under either contract (ECC 14.2, FIDIC 3.4). Under the ECC she may also still take a delegated action herself (14.2).

Source: ECC 14.2. FIDIC 3.3, 3.4, 4.3.

Who does what

A new Engineer needs 42 days’ Notice, but a new Project Manager needs no notice period

Exhibit 7Replacing Dana: the notice Merrow Vale gets

“not less than 42 days before the intended date of replacement” (FIDIC 3.6)

ECCNo minimum
0 days
Red BookNotice before the change
42 days
014 days28 days42 days
Merrow Vale may object, with reasons, in its first 14 daysThe rest of the notice period

Aldermere Water cannot appoint someone Merrow Vale reasonably objects to (3.6). Under the ECC it just names the replacement to Merrow Vale (14.4).

If Dana cannot act, for example through illness, Aldermere Water may appoint a replacement at once, by a Notice with reasons. That appointment stays temporary until Merrow Vale accepts the person or another is appointed (3.6).

Source: ECC 14.4. FIDIC 3.6.

Quick check · Who does what

Three questions on what you have just covered

Quick checkPick an answer to see if you are right and why
1Tom tests a length of culvert pipe on the Site. Where does his power to do so come from?
Both contracts: Dana’s delegation to him by Notice
ECC: his own role. Red Book: Dana’s delegation
Both contracts: his own role as Dana’s inspector
2Suppose Aldermere Water wanted a new Engineer from Wednesday 1 July 2026. By when must Merrow Vale receive its Notice?
Wednesday 17 June 2026
Any day before 1 July
Wednesday 20 May 2026
3Suppose Tom instructs a further test on a culvert joint. Owen doubts it and refers it to Dana by a Notice she receives on Monday 18 May 2026. To reverse or vary it, by when must Dana’s answer reach Merrow Vale?
Monday 25 May 2026
Friday 22 May 2026
Monday 1 June 2026

3 questions to answer

Source: ECC 14.4, 41.5. FIDIC 1.1.25, 1.3, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6.

Communications that count

At Aldermere an ECC reply is due within two weeks, unless a clause says otherwise

Exhibit 8The wet well design, February and March 2026

“agree to the extension before the reply is due” (13.5)

The wet well design and the period for replyOne ECC lane from mid February to early April 2026. Five numbered markers match the events in the card and the list.FebruaryMarchAprilECCDue 25 Mar2 weeks2 weeksextended1Submitted2Not accepted3Resubmitted4Agreed5Accepted
  1. 116 FebSubmittedECC Merrow Vale submits its wet well design for acceptance. Dana’s reply is due within two weeks, the period for reply.
  2. 227 FebNot acceptedECC Dana does not accept it. Her reason, no flotation check, tells Merrow Vale what to put right (13.4).
  3. 311 MarResubmittedECC Merrow Vale resubmits inside the period for reply, with the flotation check added. A fresh two weeks starts.
  4. 419 MarAgreedECC Dana and Merrow Vale agree to extend the reply to 1 April. They agree before it falls due on 25 March (13.5).
  5. 531 MarAcceptedECC Dana accepts the design, inside the extended period.
116 FebECC

…

ECC · period for reply2 weeksThe , set in the Contract Data. A clause may set its own time, such as one week in 61.4.
Red Book · no general period21 daysFor Dana’s Review of the same design, received 17 February, so to 10 March. Each Sub-⁠Clause sets its own period (4.4.1).

Source: ECC 13.3, 13.4, 13.5, 61.4. FIDIC 4.4.1.

Communications that count

The Red Book counts a portal Notice from the day after it is sent

Exhibit 9When does it take effect?

“deemed to have been received on the day after transmission” (FIDIC 1.3)

ECC · takes effect…As it passes through the portal, the the Scope names (13.2).
Red Book · received……

A Red Book day is a calendar day, so weekends count (1.1.25). With no system named in the Scope, an ECC communication takes effect when it reaches the recipient’s address (13.2).

Source: ECC 13.2. FIDIC 1.1.25, 1.3.

Communications that count

A Red Book Notice must say it is a Notice and come from Owen

Exhibit 10A model Notice
What to writeNotice of Claim

NOTICE

To: Dana Whitfield, the Engineer

Copy: Aldermere Water

From: Owen Hale, Contractor’s Representative

Our  (Sub-⁠Clause 20.2.1) for [the event].

We became aware of it on [date].

In the Toolkit: FIDIC 2017 Claim Notices

Why it counts

  1. Headed as a Notice“if it is a Notice, it shall be identified as a Notice” (FIDIC 1.3)
  2. Sent from Owen’s own account (1.3, 4.3)
  3. Copied to Aldermere Water (1.3)

ECCHead it as a compensation event notification (61.3). Send it alone through the portal (13.2, 13.7). Model: Toolkit Letter 02.

Source: ECC 13.2, 13.7. FIDIC 1.3, 4.3, 20.2.1.

Communications that count

The ECC names no sender for Merrow Vale, but only Owen sends a Red Book Notice

Exhibit 11Does it meet the rules?

“including issuing and receiving all Notices and other communications” (FIDIC 4.3)

Message 1 of 6

…

Source: ECC 13.2, 13.7. FIDIC 1.3, 4.3.

Quick check · Communications that count

Three questions on what you have just covered

Quick checkPick an answer to see if you are right and why
1Owen’s Notice of Claim for the buried concrete had to be received by Tuesday 31 March 2026. What was the last day to send it through the portal?
Tuesday 31 March
Monday 30 March
Friday 27 March
2ECC. Dana’s reply to the resubmitted wet well design was due on 25 March. Suppose she asks Merrow Vale on 26 March to agree a later date. Can the period still be extended?
No. It had to be agreed before the reply was due
Yes, if Merrow Vale agrees within the next week
Yes. Dana may extend it alone as Project Manager
3Suppose the Aldermere Scope named no communication system. When would Leila’s posted ECC notification take effect?
On the day that Leila posts the letter
On the day after Leila posts the letter
When it reaches Dana’s notified address

3 questions to answer

Source: FIDIC 1.3, 20.2.1. ECC 13.2, 13.5, 60.1(6).

When documents conflict

The Red Book ranks documents, while the ECC leaves clashes to Dana

Exhibit 12Settling a clash

ECC: no ranking

“The Project Manager states how the ambiguity or inconsistency should be resolved” (17.1)

  • Dana and Merrow Vale notify each other of any at once (17.1).
  • A Scope change settling it favours the Party that did not write the Scope (63.10).
  • Notify an illegal or impossible Scope requirement too (17.2).

Toolkit Letter 07 notifies an ambiguity or inconsistency.

Red Book: priority list

  1. Letter of Tender
  2. General Conditions
  3. Drawings
  4. Schedules
  5. Other documents

After a prompt Notice of any discrepancy, Dana clarifies or instructs (1.5).

Source: ECC 17.1, 17.2, 63.10. FIDIC 1.1.10, 1.5.

On the project

Both versions share one portal, but Red Book Notices land a day later

Exhibit 13Aldermere, December 2025 to March 2026
Aldermere communications under both contractsTwo lanes from December 2025 to March 2026. Each numbered marker matches an event in the card and the list.DecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchECCRed BookFound 3 Mar28 days from receipt1 week1Sent 22 Dec2Received 23 Dec3Programme due4Effect 6 Mar5Sent 6 Mar6Received 7 Mar7Reply due
  1. 122 DecSent 22 DecRed Book Dana sends her Sub-⁠Clause 8.1 Notice of the Commencement Date through the portal.
  2. 223 DecReceived 23 DecRed Book The Notice is deemed received. The 28 days for the initial programme run from today.
  3. 320 JanProgramme dueRed Book The initial programme is due, 28 days after receipt of the 8.1 Notice.
  4. 46 MarEffect 6 MarECC Leila’s compensation event notification goes through the portal on its own. It takes effect that day.
  5. 56 MarSent 6 MarRed Book Leila drafts the Notice of Claim, headed as a Notice. Owen sends it from his own portal account.
  6. 67 MarReceived 7 MarRed Book The Notice of Claim is deemed received, a day after the ECC notification took effect.
  7. 713 MarReply dueECC Dana’s one week to reply to Leila’s notification ends (61.4).
122 DecRed Book

…

ECC · sent 6 MarchSame dayLeila’s notification takes effect as it passes through the portal
Red Book · sent 6 MarchNext dayOwen’s Notice of Claim is deemed received on 7 March

Red Book only: the Letter of Acceptance arrived by hand on 15 December 2025 and the DAAB was appointed on 8 January 2026. Both versions start on 12 January, the in the ECC and the in the Red Book.

Source: ECC 13.2, 13.7, 61.4. FIDIC 1.3, 4.3, 8.1, 8.3, 21.1.

Quick check · Documents and the project

Two questions on what you have just covered

Quick checkPick an answer to see if you are right and why
1Suppose Dana’s Sub-⁠Clause 8.1 Notice had gone through the portal on Thursday 18 December 2025. By when would the initial programme have been due?
Friday 16 January 2026
Thursday 15 January 2026
Tuesday 20 January 2026
2ECC. Dana resolves an inconsistency in the Scope that Aldermere Water provided, and her answer changes the Scope. How is the compensation event assessed?
On the reading most favourable to Aldermere Water
On the reading most favourable to Merrow Vale
On the reading Dana thinks is the fairest

2 questions to answer

Source: FIDIC 1.3, 8.3. ECC 17.1, 63.10.

Watch out

Six mistakes to avoid

Exhibit 14Common mistakes
01Red Book
Sending a Notice from Leila’s account

Only Owen can give it.

FIDIC 1.3, 4.3
02Red Book
Counting from the day you send

A portal Notice arrives next day.

FIDIC 1.3
03Red Book
Expecting neutrality in every act

Only 3.7 work is neutral.

FIDIC 3.2, 3.7
04ECC
Notifying inside meeting minutes

Send each one on its own.

ECC 13.7
05ECC
Agreeing an extension too late

Agree it before the reply is due.

ECC 13.5
06ECC
Looking for an order of precedence

Notify the clash to Dana.

ECC 17.1

Source: ECC 13.5, 13.7, 17.1. FIDIC 1.3, 3.2, 3.7, 4.3.

Summary

The rules side by side

Exhibit 15Two contracts, one scheme at a glance
TopicECCRed Book
How it is builtCore clauses plus the chosen Options, with Contract Data in two partsContract Data part oneThe printed General Conditions, changed by the Particular Conditions (Parts A and B)Sub-⁠Clauses 1.1.9, 1.1.59
Runs the contractThe Project Manager, named by the Client. Not a Party. Alone changes the ScopeClauses 11.2(13), 14.3The Engineer, appointed by the Employer. Not a PartySub-⁠Clauses 3.1, 1.1.60
How they actAs the contract states, with mutual trust and co-operationClauses 10.1, 10.2For the Employer, but neutrally when agreeing or determining. No power to amend the ContractSub-⁠Clauses 3.2, 3.7
Site inspectionThe Supervisor, with powers of its own over tests and Clauses 41.5, 43.1, 43.2The Engineer’s Representative or assistants, with delegated authority onlySub-⁠Clauses 3.3, 3.4
TopicECCRed Book
DelegationAny action, once the Contractor has been notifiedClause 14.2By Notice to both Parties. Never 3.7 work or a Notice to CorrectSub-⁠Clause 3.4
ReplacementThe Client names the replacement to the Contractor. No notice periodClause 14.4Notice at least 42 days ahead. The Contractor may object within 14 daysSub-⁠Clause 3.6
Contractor’s sideNo set representative. The Contract Data names its key personsClause 24.1The Contractor’s Representative gives and receives every NoticeSub-⁠Clause 4.3
TopicECCRed Book
RepliesWithin the period for reply, unless a clause says otherwise. Extended only by agreement before it is dueClauses 13.3, 13.5No general period. Each Sub-⁠Clause sets its own, such as 21 days for a ReviewSub-⁠Clause 4.4.1
FormSent “in a form which can be read, copied and recorded” (13.1). Each notification goes separatelyClause 13.7In writing, identified as a Notice, from the named person’s own addressSub-⁠Clauses 1.3, 4.3
Takes effectAs it passes through the Scope’s system. Without one, on arrival at the recipient’s addressClause 13.2When received. A portal Notice is deemed received the next daySub-⁠Clause 1.3
Conflicting documentsNo order of precedence. The Project Manager states how to resolve itClause 17.1A priority list. After a Notice, the Engineer clarifies or instructsSub-⁠Clause 1.5

Source: ECC 10.1, 10.2, 11.2(13), 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.7, 14.2, 14.3, 14.4, 17.1, 24.1, 41.5, 43.1, 43.2. FIDIC 1.1.9, 1.1.59, 1.1.60, 1.3, 1.5, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, 3.7, 4.3, 4.4.1.

Check your understanding

Five questions

Quiz
…

Source: see each answer.

Module 1 complete

You can now find your way round both contracts

Your quiz scoreNot taken yet

You can now

  • Find your way round each contract and check its printing.
  • Say who does what under each contract, on both sides.
  • Explain when the Engineer must act neutrally.
  • Send a communication that counts, and work out when it takes effect.
  • Translate terms and deal with documents that conflict.

Independent course material. It is not published or endorsed by NEC or FIDIC. Clause references are to the NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract (June 2017 with amendments January 2023) and the FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction, Second Edition 2017 as first published. The project and the people are invented. Short quotes from NEC4 (© NEC 2017) and the FIDIC Red Book (© FIDIC 2017) are used for review and comment. Read the full clauses in your own copy of the contract.

Source: NEC4 ECC (June 2017, amended January 2023). FIDIC Red Book 2017 as first published.